On Tue, 2005-02-01 at 00:49 +0900, Daigo Moriwaki wrote: > >* Depending on ruby on debian/control indicates: > > > > > The new build-dependences should contain enough packages.
But it has redundant dependencies: Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 4.0.0), docbook-to-man, ruby (>= 1.8), ruby (<< 1.9), ruby1.8, libruby1.8, libyaml-ruby1.8, libzlib-ruby1.8 Shouldn't by enough to depend on ruby? Or even ruby1.8, in case it needs specific 1.8 depend? The same for libgems-ruby1.8. I mean, why specify a ruby dependency with a version indicating clearly only ruby1.8? > >* Since libgems-ruby will provide atm libgems-ruby1.8, this last one > >should be an indep-arch package (both are architecture dependant). > > > > > What does mean 'atm' ? At The Moment. > Anyway, I rewrote with "Architecture: all". I misunderstood 'any' with > 'all'. > Thanks. I am in the process of New Maintainer. But now both of the packages are 'all' packages. libgems-ruby should be an independent architecture package providing dependent architecture libgems-ruby1.8 package. > >* Upstream latest release is not 0.8.3, why not package 0.8.4? > > > > > I put the new one at the same site. Ruby is fun :) -- David Moreno Garza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | http://www.damog.net/ I wanna live 'til I die, no more, no less. GPG: C671257D - 6EF6 C284 C95D 78F6 0B78 FFD3 981C 5FD7 C671 257D -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
