Le lundi 08 février 2010 à 08:39 -0500, Adam C Powell IV a écrit : > Hello, > > Some time ago, the netlib and ATLAS implementations of BLAS and LAPACK > were ABI-compatible, and used alternatives symlinks to access their > different libraries with the same ABI. > > I don't know when it happened, but at some point they diverged, and now > the netlib packages have libblas-3gf.so and liblapackgf-3.so, and ATLAS > has libblas-3.so and liblapack-3.so. > > I know that ATLAS has its own API as well, but it was nice back in the > day to be able to build to the netlib API, and then swap them back at > forth at runtime using update-alternatives. About this subject, I found a nice page on gentoo's website: http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/science/blas-lapack.xml
Does anyone has an objection on trying to moving blas/lapack implementations on an update-alternatives system? Sylvestre -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-science-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1266748618.10752.7307.ca...@zlarin
