Hi, Le dimanche 05 novembre 2023 à 21:49 -0500, Mo Zhou a écrit : > The following line is what I use for the PyTorch package (ignore the > fact that I forgot to bump the BLIS abi from 3 to 4): > > Recommends: libopenblas0 | libblis3 | libatlas3-base | libmkl-rt | libblas3 > > So the latest Recommends line for performance critical packages relying > on BLAS/LAPACK should use: > > Recommends: libopenblas0 | libblis4 | libmkl-rt | libblas3 > > libmkl-rt is oudated (I knew it), but anyway usable. Quite a few months > ago I wrote the plan for overhauling the MKL package. Will carry it out > when I'm available for that.
Indeed I think it is ok to add libmkl-rt here despite the fact that it is non-free, because it is not the default alternative (see Policy §2.2.1). I’m not really sure that I want to encourage that though. > libblas3 as the last fallback when none of the others are available. > This seems missing from the message draft. It is not necessary to mention libblas3 in Recommends because the Depends field normally already includes libblas.so.3 | libblas3. Hence libblas3 is already the last fallback. -- ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀ Sébastien Villemot ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁ Debian Developer ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀ https://sebastien.villemot.name ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀ https://www.debian.org
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
