Hi Alastair, Am Fri, Apr 19, 2024 at 10:05:35AM +0100 schrieb Alastair McKinstry: > Yes I will change maintainer on the next upload.
Thanks. > ncl is in "maintenance" mode as of 2019. There is a pivot to python (pyNCL > and other python modules) but there are still a lot of ncl scripts in use > out there, so an upstream release is unlikely. Thank you for the status update. BTW, I'd recommend running routine-update on the packaging (I'd volunteer to do so and push to Git in case you want me to do so.) Kind regards Andreas. > Kind regards > > Alastair > > On 19/04/2024 09:43, Andreas Tille wrote: > > Hi Alastair, > > > > I've found ncl in the list of packages with t64 transition issues. > > Since I know its a Debian Science package I had a look and realised > > that this package has not set > > > > Maintainer: Debian Science Maintainers > > <debian-science-maintain...@lists.alioth.debian.org> > > > > as per team policy (and you as well as possibly others as Uploaders). > > Do you have any specific reason for this? > > > > BTW, when looking into it uscan reports > > > > uscan info: Newest version of ncl on remote site is 6.6.2, local version is > > 6.6.2.dfsg.1 > > uscan info: => Only older package available from: > > > > This is probably due to using .dfsg instead of +dfsg. I tried to add > > some dversionmangle option but when featuring a '.' this is refused as > > "unsafe" by uscan. I'd recommend to change this with next upstream > > version. > > > > Kind regards > > Andreas. > > > > [1] https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2024/04/msg00331.html > > > -- > Alastair McKinstry, > GPG: 82383CE9165B347C787081A2CBE6BB4E5D9AD3A5 > e: mckins...@debian.org, im: @alastair:mckinstry.ie > > -- https://fam-tille.de
