On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:32 +1000, Andrew McGlashan wrote: > Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > That issue has been corrected, and the point release is being > > re-published this morning as 6.0.2.1. There are no changes in package > > content; the only difference from the original 6.0.2 (aside from > > versioning in Release files, etc.) is the fix to the Packages files. > > Then, shouldn't that be 6.0.2a just like which occurred previously to > result in 6.0.1a to replace 6.0.1 ????
The "a" suffix has previously been used to indicate CD-only rebuilds - i.e. where no changes were made on the archive side (with one exception during etch's stable lifetime). As this involved a change to the archive (albeit a minor one) we decided to use a version which distinguished it from a CD-only change. Regards, Adam -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-security-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/1309099577.2622.53.ca...@hathi.jungle.funky-badger.org
