On Saturday, 2017-01-28 at 14:51:19 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Sat, Jan 28, 2017 at 03:04:56PM +0100, Daniel Reichelt wrote: > > I highly suspect this stems from packages' rules files supporting > > reproducible builds.
> I rather think this is due to binNMUs not modifying debian/changelog… > (in the source package while it's modified in the binary packages…) This is completely counter intuitive. I'm using rsnapshot to backup a few private machines. I will have to set up separate rsnapshots for those parts of the backup that suffer from this <expletive>, to avoid bogging down the data parts by unnecessary checksum calculations. This problem may affect many other backups too. Did anybody research backup programs before this <expletive> was introduced to Debian? The servers are all Debian, except for my home router which is running OpenWRT. But for curiosity, does anybody know if Ubuntu is using the same <expletive>, or are they doing the usual, i.e. not follow Debian? Thanks, Lupe Christoph -- | As everyone knows, it was predicted that the world would end last | | Wednesday at 10:00 PST. Since there appears to be a world in existence | | now, the entire universe must therefore have been recreated, complete | | with an apparent "history", last *Thursday*. QED. | | Seanna Watson, <1992nov2.165142.11...@bcrka451.bnr.ca> |
