> > This is a request for some feedback from current and potential users of
> GPC.
> > I have GPC 2.0 compiled for hamm, built using GCC 2.7.2.3. The next
> > version of GPC (currently 971001) is in beta, but is already more stable
> > than GPC 2.0. There seems to be a few possibilities available. I could
> > package GPC 2.0, GPC 971001 beta, both versions, or wait until GPC 971001
> > beta is released as GPC 2.1. Let me know your preferences, if any, within
> > the next few of days and I will then decide which course of action to take.
>
> I'd say package 2.1 beta, into unstable and 2.0 as stable. Then
> update the beta package when GPC get's released.
>
> I have a few pascal programs, that would be nice to compile on Linux
> and I'd want to use 2.1 as it is more complete than 2.0.
Upload the beta version into "experimental".
Brian
( [EMAIL PROTECTED] )
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Management should work for the engineers, not the other way around.
--
TO UNSUBSCRIBE FROM THIS MAILING LIST: e-mail the word "unsubscribe" to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
Trouble? e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] .
