On Fri, 24 Apr 1998, Ossama Othman wrote: > Hi guys, > > Perhaps a "debian-pine" list is in order. :) > > This whole PINE issue is getting blown way out of proportion. Debian's > policy is clear. Both sides have points but I agree more that Debian > should not interpret PINE's licensing in a way that would obviously be > "pushing things" and that may have the potential of bringing Debian into a > legal battle. IMHO, Debian's PINE maintainer made the right decision, > even if it does inconvenience PINE users for a little while. However, > this time of inconvenience will pass; especially as it becomes a "given" > that PINE will not be distributed as it used to be.
I agree > I have always respected the opinions of George and Marcus, and still do. > I ask that we all just give this PINE issue a rest, at least for a little > while. My middle finger is getting a callous from hitting the delete key > "d" when deleting all of these PINE posts. :-) hehe... Ditto. > And, yes I am a PINE user. Ditto again Michael Beattie ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- "If you don't know where you want to go, we'll make sure you get taken." -Japanese Microsoft ad slogan translated back into English ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Debian GNU/Linux.... Ooohh You are missing out! -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]