This is a masq'ing firewall so that is in my firewall rules already.  Good
thought though.

Thus spake Adam McDaniel ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):

> On Thu, Sep 20, 2001 at 08:56:52AM -0600, Robert L. Harris wrote:
> > {0}:wally:/etc/init.d>telnet 192.168.0.1 80
> > Trying 192.168.0.1...
> > telnet: Unable to connect to remote host: Connection refused
> 
> may seem like a silly suggestion, but i beleive iptables has the same
> rule as in ipchains where you need to go
> 
> echo 1 > /proc/sys/net/ipv4/ip_forward
> 
> check the contents of that file before you do that command though, if its '0',
> that might be your problem
> 
> -- 
> Adam McDaniel
> Infrastructure Technology Consultant
> M-Tech Mercury Information Technology, Inc.
> 
> 
> -- 
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]



:wq!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Robert L. Harris                |  Micros~1 :  
Senior System Engineer          |    For when quality, reliability 
  at RnD Consulting             |      and security just aren't
                                \_       that important!
DISCLAIMER:
      These are MY OPINIONS ALONE.  I speak for no-one else.
FYI:
 perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);'

Reply via email to