Marc Shapiro: > Marc Shapiro wrote: >> Jochen Schulz wrote: >> >> But, once it does get into Sid, or whatever testing will be, then it >> is almost certain to get backported so that those of us that prefer a >> 'stable' machine can get to all the sites that want 'the most current >> version of Flash' which seems to include sites like nickjr.com and >> noggin.com. Both of these worked until recently, but now I am having >> problems with them, and my daughter (almost 6 years old) really likes >> the games. >> > Ooops! I missed that you were suggesting that Etch would not make the > December release, and were not referring to Flash Player 9.
I did refer to FP9, I only mentioned FP8 because I have never seen a
site telling my I need FP9, but there are a couple that reject browsers
with at least FP8.
But what I actually wanted to say: FP is closed-source. I do not think
that there is a way to backport it.
J.
--
I am worried that my dreams pale in comparison beside TV docu-soaps.
[Agree] [Disagree]
<http://www.slowlydownward.com/NODATA/data_enter2.html>
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
