> I've seen several warnings now about making sure to change "testing" to > "etch" in /etc/apt/sources.lst once Etch goes stable. (For testing > purposes I've just always left it "etch".) But what if what I want is > to keep our machines at "testing"? It seems to have the latest and > grooviest versions of stuff. So how badly would I be shooting myself in > the foot if I changed "etch" to "testing" in /etc/apt/sources.lst and > just left it that way?
Have a look at this link: http://people.cornell.edu/pages/kk288/debian_choosing_distribution.html It answers a lot of questions that relate to stable, testing and unstable. Scan down the page until you hit some graphs (about midway) showing Maintenance Problems vs. Time. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
