On Sun, May 03, 2009 at 07:01:39AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote: > On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 1:19 PM, Bret Busby <b...@busby.net> wrote: > > On Sat, 2 May 2009, Neal Hogan wrote: > >> On Sat, May 2, 2009 at 9:30 AM, Douglas A. Tutty <dtu...@vianet.ca> wrote: > >>> On Sat, May 02, 2009 at 06:27:44AM -0500, Neal Hogan wrote:
> > So, if BSD is more complicated than using package management like RPM in Red > > Hat and .deb in Debian/Ubuntu, then it is probably too complicated for me. > > > It's not . . . http://www.openbsd.org/ports.html The ports system works very easily, very similar to apt-get. However, right now, they don't have security updates for ports in -stable. If you run -current and want to update a port, AFAIK, you have to upgrade to the next snapshot for the whole system. For me, that's a lot of bandwidth on dialup. Doug. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org