On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 15:44:54 -0500, Celejar wrote: > On Sun, 31 Jan 2010 19:11:37 +0000 (UTC) Camaleón <noela...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > ... > >> One is Flash Player, needed as much as hated, but it's a matter of fact >> that for todays browsing is a "must have". > > Disagree. I do most of my browsing in an IW profile without Flash. It's > easy enough to download YouTube video using youtube-dl or clive / > cclive, and the only sites that seem to really require Flash are flashy > game or advertisement sites, which I can generally do without. I don't > deny that Flash can be useful, but I wouldn't call it a "must have".
Some animations, multimedia applications or control buttons for validating user input data that are embedded in a flash container need to call external (x)html code (remote javascript, XML files or action script) to be properly managed and displayed so you can interact with them. Not all the flashes out there are just "movies" :-) Greetings, -- Camaleón -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
