On Mon, Sep 2, 2013 at 11:04 AM, Curt <cu...@free.fr> wrote: > On 2013-09-02, Zenaan Harkness <z...@freedbms.net> wrote: >> >> I actually thought the same for a bit, but apt-cache show vim-athena >> seems to show description just fine. > > Well, I'm not getting the same output as you for the same packages, and > it's not the package description that apt-cache shows that seems to be > in question. > > curty@einstein:~$ dpkg-query --list vim-athena > No packages found matching vim-athena. > > curty@einstein:~$ dpkg -l \* | grep vim > ii vim 2:7.2.445+hg~cb94c42c0e1a-1 Vi IMproved - > enhanced vi editor > ii vim-common 2:7.2.445+hg~cb94c42c0e1a-1 Vi IMproved - > Common files > un vim-doc <none> (no description > available) > un vim-gnome <none> (no description > available) > un vim-gtk <none> (no description > available) > un vim-lesstif <none> (no description > available) > un vim-nox <none> (no description > available) > ii vim-runtime 2:7.2.445+hg~cb94c42c0e1a-1 Vi IMproved - > Runtime files > un vim-scripts <none> (no description > available) > ii vim-tiny 2:7.2.445+hg~cb94c42c0e1a-1 Vi IMproved - > enhanced vi editor
Does "apt-cache show vim-common" list vim-athena on the "Recommends:" line? -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/CAOdo=swz+vwaborkpnmcldj6y2v46bemroxtkbdfsvv9tld...@mail.gmail.com
