Andrei POPESCU wrote: >Sven Hartge wrote: >> All other were mostly misconfigrations which kinda worked before, >> because sysvinit was more forgiving or just papered over the error, for >> example unavailable volumes during boot without "nofail" or "_netdev". > > It's also very unforgiving of wrong fstab entries (see #756103).
yes, i got bit by that one last week. i also put in a wishlist item for a better method of handling failed items rather than clobbering the terminals of the rescue mode. as the common suggestion is to open an alternate terminal i suggested to open that up immediately and then at least you have a way of interacting before considering something a fatal error. one comment i've seen in a few bugs is that how are the systemd developers supposed to know when something not coming up is really fatal or not. i think asking the user is one way to avoid a lot of unneeded failures. in my case if i'd gotten an alternate terminal asking me if having a cd player unavailable was fatal the answer would have easily been no, and then i could have known right away what the issue was related to, had a bootable system and not had to jump through a lot of hoops to figure out what was going on (turning off quiet boot, turning on persistent journaling, installing a bootable wheezy, etc.). songbird -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/cfunbb-7o8....@id-306963.user.uni-berlin.de