Eduard Bloch writes: > That's not my impression. It's more like: if you don't like systemd, > don't use it.
If I am left free of doing it, there is no problem, Debian does not force me to use any desktop environment at all, and that pleases me much, so if I am left free to use an older, tested and reliable init system there is no problem at all. > If you don't like it that much that you want to rant > against it, make sure your arguments have some proof/backup. Systemd is responsible of too many things, does too many things, and this is not a good design choice. There were other poor design choices, it seems that Debian maintainers have fixed some of them (i.e. renaming network devices), other seems to be still there (binary logs...). But I have no time or will to investigate the subject anymore. When Debian stable will use systemd in a default installation/dist-upgrade i will brace for impact and then consider what to do. Quickly, since my work depends on it :). > Since systemd hatters usually fail on the second task, the rhetorical > arsenal is chosen accordingly (ad-hominem, trolling, misquoting, ...). Beware. Using the second word of the arsenal may make its user elegible of being the one on the other end of the telephone in this strip: http://ars.userfriendly.org/cartoons/?id=19990211 -- /\ ___ Ubuntu: ancient /___/\_|_|\_|__|___Gian Uberto Lauri_____ African word //--\| | \| | Integralista GNUslamico meaning "I can \/ coltivatore diretto di software not install già sistemista a tempo (altrui) perso... Debian" Warning: gnome-config-daemon considered more dangerous than GOTO -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-user-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/21609.59695.729334.363...@mail.eng.it
