On Wednesday 30 December 2015 17:55:48 Brian wrote: > On Wed 30 Dec 2015 at 15:33:25 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote: > > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 15:22:29 Steve Matzura wrote: > > > Thinking this tool would be the answer to life, etc., I tried it. Have > > > now tried it on three Windows and two borrowed Linux machines, all > > > with the same 0 results, which means it must be something I'm doing > > > wrong. Unfortunately, the Linux machines in question don't have > > > sufficient space to hold the downloads anyway, but this was merely an > > > exercise to see if Windows is the problem. It isn't. I know this > > > because I got the same two errors no matter which platform on which > > > Jigdo was tried. > > > > > > When I run the script that controls things, it gets right up to the > > > wget part, then fails with either of two errors over and over: > > > > > > 1. result too large > > > > > > 2. 404 > > > > > > I have been at this literally all night, trying mirrors in seven > > > states--New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Florida, Pennsylvania, > > > Wisconsin, California--some close, some further away, and have gotten > > > absolutely nothing but the errors listed above. If I could capture the > > > wget output, I would be happy to send it along, but the above brief > > > error descriptions really say it all. Suggestions? > > > > Copied and pasted from my reply to your earlier thread: > > > > Why not use the net-install? That fits _easily_ on a stick, even a small > > Steve Matzura is trying to put a "complete three-disk installation set > on a single medium" with jigdo. Using a netinst ISO doesn't seem to fit > the bill.
For the purpose of installing it. So it does fit the bill. (See his reply to me.) Lisi