On Wednesday 30 December 2015 17:55:48 Brian wrote:
> On Wed 30 Dec 2015 at 15:33:25 +0000, Lisi Reisz wrote:
> > On Wednesday 30 December 2015 15:22:29 Steve Matzura wrote:
> > > Thinking this tool would be the answer to life, etc., I tried it. Have
> > > now tried it on three Windows and two borrowed Linux machines, all
> > > with the same 0 results, which means it must be something I'm doing
> > > wrong. Unfortunately, the Linux machines in question don't have
> > > sufficient space to hold the downloads anyway, but this was merely an
> > > exercise to see if Windows is the problem. It isn't. I know this
> > > because I got the same two errors no matter which platform on which
> > > Jigdo was tried.
> > >
> > > When I run the script that controls things, it gets right up to the
> > > wget part, then fails with either of two errors over and over:
> > >
> > > 1. result too large
> > >
> > > 2. 404
> > >
> > > I have been at this literally all night, trying mirrors in seven
> > > states--New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts, Florida, Pennsylvania,
> > > Wisconsin, California--some close, some further away, and have gotten
> > > absolutely nothing but the errors listed above. If I could capture the
> > > wget output, I would be happy to send it along, but the above brief
> > > error descriptions really say it all. Suggestions?
> >
> > Copied and pasted from my reply to your earlier thread:
> >
> > Why not use the net-install?  That fits _easily_ on a stick, even a small
>
> Steve Matzura is trying to put a "complete three-disk installation set
> on a single medium" with jigdo. Using a netinst ISO doesn't seem to fit
> the bill.

For the purpose of installing it.  So it does fit the bill.  (See his reply to 
me.)

Lisi

Reply via email to