On Friday 13 May 2016 16:10:17 to...@tuxteam.de wrote: > On Fri, May 13, 2016 at 03:35:29PM -0400, Gene Heskett wrote: > > [...] > > > But for the above comparison to work correctly, you (and everybody > > responding to your message) would have to post the version number of > > the parent package that held this file too. No use comparing apples > > to tangerines. :) > > Gene, you have me confused now. This is *exactly* what we did: we > compared the version of the package containing update-rc.d and the > program file's sha1sum. Both match. > > We still get different behaviours, thus there must be something > different in the execution environment. At least we know now where > *not* to look :-) > > regards > -- tomás
Yes, I believe we are on the same page, so obviously there is something else gone aglay in the environment as you suggested. You are I believe, making progress in discovering that, so I'll bow out and try not to confuse an issue about which I apparently know not well enough. Cheers, Gene Heskett -- "There are four boxes to be used in defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, and ammo. Please use in that order." -Ed Howdershelt (Author) Genes Web page <http://geneslinuxbox.net:6309/gene>