Hi. On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 03:36:12PM -0400, Henning Follmann wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2017 at 08:00:10PM +0200, Nicolas George wrote: > > Le decadi 30 messidor, an CCXXV, mar...@martinbrandenburg.com a > > ecrit: > > > I don't read messages from you or in fact anyone at your domain, > > > except > > > this one, because they're written in base64. > > > > If you see the base64, then your mail software is broken or > > hopelessly outdated. Technically, this mail was conform to the > > standards: even though the base64 encoding was not necessary, it > > was perfectly legal. > > > > That does not mean you should read Fungi4All's mails, though. But do > > not blame the form, blame the substance. > > Well, the OP complaining about HTML and using himself an equally > stupid encoding had it coming and deserves any critique just for being > hypocritical.
The encoding in OP's e-mail works just fine for me. Sending pure HTML e-mail on the other hand in explicitly forbidden by [1]. > And btw. posting to a high volume mailinglist should always be ASCII > only and interwoven. Are you aware that your e-mail contains this wonderful header: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 [1] https://www.debian.org/MailingLists/ Reco