On 07/15/2018 10:48 PM, Octopus Octopus wrote: > > > > On 07/15/2018 08:57 PM, John Crawley wrote: >> On 2018-07-16 04:33, Richard Owlett wrote: >>> Can I a Debian user opt to not install "LSB" without ill effects? >> >> Some ...er, many Debian packages depend on lsb-base. >> 'apt-cache rdepends lsb-base' for a long list. > > as <o...@debian.org> states > > For all practical concerns, you should consider the LSB package orphaned > (and > I should probably just go ahead and orphan it). > > and if a lot of things depend on lsb-base, isn't that like, very very > bad? Like 'a critical component of our system has been left completely > unmaintained' bad?
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re: Debian got t... Richard Owlett
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re: Debian g... tomas
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re: Deb... Richard Owlett
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re: Deb... Reco
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re:... Richard Owlett
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re:... Curt
- Re: Naive newbie question [Re:... Zenaan Harkness
- Differences between installs (... Stefan Monnier
- Re: Differences between instal... Curt
- Re: A Different Naive Question [Re: Naive n... Octopus Octopus
- Re: A Different Naive Question [Re: Nai... Michael Stone
- Re: A Different Naive Question [Re... Austin LaBerta
- Re: A Different Naive Question... Greg Wooledge
- Re: Debian got too fat? Harald Dunkel
- Re: Debian got too fat? Jonathan Dowland
- Re: Debian got too fat? Nicholas Geovanis
- Re: Debian got too fat? Harald Dunkel