On Thu, Mar 07, 2024 at 09:44:51AM +0100, Hans wrote: > Hi all, > I believe, I found the reason, why mails are marked as spam and others not. > > All spam mails shjow this entry in the header: > > --- sninp --- > > Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; spf=none > smtp.mailfrom=lists.debian.org > Authentication-Results: mail35c50.megamailservers.eu; > dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) > header.d=debian.org header.i=@debian.org header.b="pDp/TPD5" > Return-Path: <bounce-debian-devel=hans.ullrich=loop...@lists.debian.org> > Received: from bendel.debian.org (bendel.debian.org [82.195.75.100]) > by mail35c50.megamailservers.eu (8.14.9/8.13.1) with ESMTP id > 425I9ZEK112497 > for <hans.ullr...@loop.de>; Tue, 5 Mar 2024 18:09:37 +0000 > > --- snap --- > > White mails get the dkim=pass and spam mails got dkim=fail (as you see above). > > However, I am not much experienced with DKIM, but as far as I read, it has > soemthing to do with key exchanges. > > But who must exchange keys? I see also bendel.debian.org and a bounce message. > > Can that be the reason, that bendel.debian.org and megameilservers.eu has > some > problems with the keys? > > On both I can not take a look and have no influence to it, but mayme the > admins > of bendel.debian.org do know more. > > Thanks for reading this, > > Best regards > > Hans
Well i think that you would be add to whitelist emails from bendel.debian.org. Thanks, Byunghee from South Korea
