On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 06:07:21PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:32:20PM +0100, Colin Watson wrote: > > On Tue, Apr 20, 2004 at 04:54:50PM +0200, Florian Ernst wrote: > > > Sarge and 2.6 as the default kernel? Well, I'd guess like »never«. > > > Maybe it will be the default in Sarge+1... > > > > > > Integrating 2.6 into the new debian-installer is work in progress, but > > > I'd be very surprised (to say the least) if it became the default > > > now... > > > > It's possible that it may be made the default on some architectures, > > although we're going to have to get a move on there (and I certainly > > don't speak for Joey ...). We'll see. > > Ah, I see, thanks. I take it you mean m68k-mac and possibly sparc32. > AFAIK it'll eventually get there, but not just yet.
I was thinking of powerpc, actually. I've done a full install using 2.6 there, although I'm waiting for some bug fixes outside d-i so I haven't yet committed everything necessary to d-i. > Is this in the light of Joey (not joeyh) saying "It is insane to > believe the security team has any chance to support Linux 2.2, Linux > 2.4 and Linux 2.6 once sarge is released." as of > http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel-0403/msg01495.html ? No, I wasn't thinking of that, just of d-i release schedules. Cheers, -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
