Raul Miller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Are you familiar with the concept of an "ambiguous phrase"?
Sure, but the Social Contract wasn't designed to place non-free into an ambiguous relationship with Debian, but to spell out exactly what the relationship is. As I read it, it's clear: we will put non-free on our servers and support it a little, but it's not Debian. It's not a little Debian, it's not Debian-like, it's explicitly stated to be not Debian. There is no text of the social contract which applies the word Debian to non-free under any description at all, but rather, serves to mention both only to make as clear as possible that non-free is not part of Debian, using those very words. > Instead, of exercising care, I see you saying other stuff which has no > place in a rational argument. For example, > > "Your dishonesty is appalling." Sven has misrepresented me beyond the point of tolerance. He stopped having a rational argument at the point where he continued to tell me what I really want or what I think even after I had told him he was wrong. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
