On Mon, Apr 26, 2004 at 11:46:43AM +0200, Martin Schulze wrote: > Speaking of the GFDL, only those documents released under the GNU FDL > are non-free that make use of invariant sections for anything else > than its license, right? > > Hence, every document released under the GNU FDL needs to be checked > for every version, but the FDL doesn't render documentation non-free > inherently, right? It doesn't render it free inherently, either, which > is very bad since a new version could become non-free unexpectedly.
Not according to Manoj's (still horribly formatted) position statement: "The GNU FDL, as it stands today, does not meet the Debian Free Software Guidelines. There are significant problems with the license, as detailed above; and, as such, we cannot accept works licensed unde the GNU FDL into our distribution." Michael -- Michael Banck Debian Developer [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.advogato.org/person/mbanck/diary.html -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]