Craig Sanders wrote: > the facts do support what i say. the debian constitution states what > documents may be created or modified by vote, yet fails to mention that > either the social contract or the DFSG may be so modified. > > what this means is that you can't call for a vote to change either of > those two documents without first getting the constitution amended to > allow it.
I don't follow your reasoning. In the first paragraph, you seem to be implying that the Social contract is not a document, since simply stating documents may be modified isn't good enough. Then in the second paragraph, you refer to it as a document. -- see shy jo
