>>"Thomas" == Thomas Bushnell, BSG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Thomas> May I suggest that one of the Project Secretary's jobs should be to Thomas> maintain an accurate and up-to-date developers list. Why the secretary? Apart from votes, the secretary is not involved in adding or removing people from the project, and shall always have to rely on information provided by other people. Secondly. I do think the process used provides the canonical number of developers; it can be checked by anyone, and the same list is used to determine whether one is authorized to install packages into Debian. Thomas> There are various reasons (some of which you note) for why Thomas> the key ring is not an adequate list... I do think that the keyring is the only authoritative list of developers, as long as one eliminates duplicates, and LDAP does seem to provide an adequate means of doing so. manoj -- "Anything worth doing is worth doing badly." Chesterton Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.debian.org/%7Esrivasta/> 1024R/C7261095 print CB D9 F4 12 68 07 E4 05 CC 2D 27 12 1D F5 E8 6E 1024D/BF24424C print 4966 F272 D093 B493 410B 924B 21BA DABB BF24 424C -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]