Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > > It was suggested that I also post the mailers that were used > in successfully sending a ballot to the voting engine, and here are > the results. I am attaching both the list of good mailers, as well > as the reasons for rejection of the ballot, with the MUA and count. > > I note that there were tweo succesful votes from people who > use Outlook (and no rejections). > > Mutt still impresses.
Speaking about Emacsen mailers, there are not enough details because Emacsen usually use external packages (gpg.el, mailcrypt) to perform encryption and signing. You wouldn't conclude that Gnus/Mew/whatever do not it right sometimes, it wouldn't make sense. Regards, -- Jérôme Marant http://marant.org