Manoj Srivastava <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Yes, it was. I did include the supercession language later on > in the document, but forgot it at the top of clause 5.
This version also looks fine modulo one spelling nit: forms of "supersede" are traditionally spelled with Ss, not Cs. -- Aaron M. Ucko, KB1CJC (amu at alum.mit.edu, ucko at debian.org) Finger [EMAIL PROTECTED] (NOT a valid e-mail address) for more info.
