On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 04:55, Jochen Voss wrote: > I second the above amendment.
Doesn't this mean the BR amendment now has enough seconds?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Fri, 2003-09-26 at 04:55, Jochen Voss wrote: > I second the above amendment.
Doesn't this mean the BR amendment now has enough seconds?
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part