On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 09:49:05AM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:15:59PM +1100, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 10:59:10PM -0500, Raul Miller wrote: > > > Please provide examples. > > We're still missing those examples, please John. > Those examples are the things that have already happened, such as Qt.
No, we need examples for this particular point: > > > On Tue, Jan 06, 2004 at 09:17:17PM -0600, John Goerzen wrote: > > > > Providing a distribution platform for non-free software seems to greatly > > > > moderate the incentive the non-free authors would have to relicense > > > > their software under the GPL You claimed that our providing the non-free section has lessened the incentive for relicensing. Please provide an example of when this was true. > I see a lot of people saying that placing things in non-free was the > cause of getting the license changed. I'm unconvinced that this is true > and that the real cause is not simply exclusion from main. In fact you implied that our non-free section is actually working against relicensing, as quoted above. You have not demonstrated that yet though. > I made no > claims about timeframe. Fine. Hamish -- Hamish Moffatt VK3SB <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
