Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > So I don't think it's a 3:1 issue. We're not changing our goals, only > clarifying the timeline and acknowledging that the etch timeframe is too > short for us to reach this goal.
I don't believe it. We already clarified the timeline, and created a perfectly clear exception for sarge. We have a precedent that making such exceptions requires a 3:1 vote, as well. Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
