On Sun, 2008-12-28 at 09:05 +0100, Andreas Barth wrote: > What this voting seems to show is that clearly a majority doesn't want to > stop the release of Lenny. What it also shows however is that the mixing up > of the other options on this ballot and the way the supermajority > requirements were set is problematic, and probably supporters of any other > option than 1 (and perhaps also except 6) can claim that they would've won > if the majority requirements were set in a way they consider more > appropriate.
It is problematic? Are you saying that the 2/3 requirement for changes to the foundation documents should not apply if a majority thinks otherwise? Thomas -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-vote-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
