On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:31:46 +0000, Christopher Halse Rogers wrote:

> @@ -25,12 +24,15 @@ else
>  endif
>  ifeq (linux, $(DEB_HOST_ARCH_OS))
>       confflags += --enable-udev
> +     confflags += --enable-libkms
> +     confflags += --enable-vmwgfx-experimental-api
>       confflags += --enable-nouveau-experimental-api
>       NOUVEAU = yes
>       confflags += --enable-radeon
>       RADEON = yes
>  else
>       confflags += --disable-udev
> +     confflags += --disable-libkms
>       confflags += --disable-nouveau-experimental-api
>       NOUVEAU = no
>       confflags += --disable-radeon
> @@ -132,6 +134,7 @@ endif
>  ifeq ($(RADEON), yes)
>       dh_strip -plibdrm-radeon1 --dbg-package=libdrm-radeon1-dbg
>  endif
> +     dh_strip -p libkms1 --dbg-package=libkms1-dbg

this should be conditional on whether the libkms1 package is being
built.

>       dh_strip -s --remaining-packages
>       dh_compress -s
>       dh_fixperms -s
> @@ -145,6 +148,7 @@ endif
>  ifeq ($(RADEON), yes)
>       dh_makeshlibs -plibdrm-radeon1 -V'libdrm-radeon1 (>= 2.4.20)' -- -c4
>  endif
> +     dh_makeshlibs -plibkms1 -V'libkms1 (>=2.4.20)' -- -c4

and same here.  See how the libdrm-foo packages are handled.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply via email to