Richard Foley wrote: > If you mean: > > 1. n <- next step over everything (including grep/map/sort). > > 2. s <- step into everything (including grep/map/sort). > > 3. forget nn and N. > > Then I would think this would be (mostly very) intuitive change, and > the behaviour (most) people would expect from the debugger, most of > the time. You'd have to check for unwarranted side effects of > course, such that blocks other than single-line grep, map and sort, > remain unaffected, but otherwise it seems to me to be a good idea.
I forgot to mention, yes I agree. My patch changed only 'n' like you wrote. Heiko --
