On 17 May 2004 at 20:56, Aaron J. Caviglia wrote: > Where can we purchase the command line scanner? Aaron -
If you are referring to the Mcafee one for $11 - Scott mentioned "My 1 year McAfee VirusScan Command Line license was $11 through CDW." We paid the same thing off of State contract from Insight. -Nick Hayer > > Thanks, > > Aaron Caviglia > > On May 17, 2004, at 8:23 PM, Goran Jovanovic wrote: > > >> For the latter there is an outstanding request to Scott to > >> kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus.. > > > > So right now if you use multiple scanners when you scan with > > ScannerA and it finds a virus Declude will still call ScannerB and > > have it scan as well? > > > > Scott pointed out that his McAfee was only $11.00 for the year so > > the price barrier is "non-existant" and I see from your and Scott's > > responses that there are indeed reasons to have more than one > > scanner. > > > > Thank you all > > > > Goran Jovanovic > > The LAN Shoppe > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nick Hayer Sent: Monday, May 17, > >> 2004 10:03 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: > >> [Declude.JunkMail] f-prot > >> > >> On 17 May 2004 at 9:13, Goran Jovanovic wrote: > >> > >>> For the folks using multiple scanners, do you have any stats on > >>> how often the secondary scanner found a virus that the first one > >>> missed? > >> Hi Goran, > >> > >> Here are my latest stats: > >> Virus Totals: > >> 441 F-Prot > >> 412 AVG > >> 446 McAfee > >> ----------------- > >> Vunerabilities: > >> 349 > >> ----------------- > >> > >> I update the defs for all every 4 hrs on a staggered schedule. > >> Because of possible false positives I have found it hard to rank > >> one particular scanner over another. For me the advantage to have > >> more than one is one [varies] company will always come out with > >> protection for a new outbreak before another. The downside is cost > >> and cpu overhead. For the latter there is an outstanding request to > >> Scott to kill additional scanning once a scanner detects a virus.. > >> > >> -Nick Hayer > >> > >> > >> > >> > >>> > >>> I realize that the cost of F-Prot (which I am using) is quite low > > and > >>> others might be as well, so it is not a cost issue but rather a > >>> "Do > > I > >>> really need it?". > >>> > >>> Thanx > >>> > >>> > >>> Goran Jovanovic > >>> The LAN Shoppe > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >>>> [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scott > >>>> Fisher Sent: Monday, May 17, 2004 12:49 AM To: > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] > >>>> f-prot > >>>> > >>>> I find the Mcafee is the best at detecting viruses within > > encrupted > >>> zips. > >>>> Otherwise they are pretty even. > >>>> > >>>> I'd recommend using F-Prot and Mcafee. > >>>> Mcafee for the DOS command line scanner is dirt cheap. I'll see > >>>> if > > I > >>> can > >>>> find my price tomorrow. > >>>> > >>>> <<< [EMAIL PROTECTED] 5/15 12:29p >>> > >>>> Can anyone tell me how f-prot compares to mcafee or symantec when > > it > >>> comes > >>>> to keeping their database up with new viruses? That just seems > >>>> pretty cheap but hey that's exactly what I'm looking for as long > > as > >>>> it works well > >>> :) > >>>> > >>>> thanks, > >>>> > >>>> Larry Craddock > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >>>> (http://www.declude.com)] > >>>> > >>>> --- > >>>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >>>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >>>> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > >>>> at http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail scanned for > >>>> viruses > > by > >>>> Declude Virus] > >>> > >>> > >>> --- > >>> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >>> (http://www.declude.com)] > >>> > >>> --- > >>> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >>> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type > >>> "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > >>> http://www.mail-archive.com. > >>> > >> > >> > >> --- > >> [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > >> (http://www.declude.com)] > >> > >> --- > >> This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > >> unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > >> type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > >> http://www.mail-archive.com. --- [This E-mail scanned for viruses > >> by Declude Virus] > > > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at > > http://www.mail-archive.com. > > > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] --- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com.
