I've been catching up on some archive reading, and came across
this.
I've recently needed to apply different filters to different domains. And I read this: > Create a folder for that domain. > > In the folder, have a $default$.junkmail file, but leave it blank. > > John Tolmachoff > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > eServices For You Does this mean that what tests are not listed in the $default$.junkmail file are then not going to get used and therefore, no weight will be applied from that test? If I wanted to not use a filter I created ,eg. badwords.txt filter, I would then put in the junkmail file badwords IGNORE (badwords being the name of the filter test) Or just not even put it in the junkmail file? I read the manual and since it didn't spell out the directions, I thought I should ask here. Thanks Ernesto ----- Original Message ----- From: "John Tolmachoff (Lists)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 11:12 PM Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail] Not scanning per domain. > Create a folder for that domain. > > In the folder, have a $default$.junkmail file, but leave it blank. > > John Tolmachoff > Engineer/Consultant/Owner > eServices For You > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:Declude.JunkMail- > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Fritz Squib > > Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2003 7:55 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: [Declude.JunkMail] Not scanning per domain. > > > > We have a client who wants NO junkmail scanning for his domain. Is there > > a > > way to shut off all scanning in the per domain settings other than WARN or > > IGNORE (i.e. remove the default.junkmail file from his per domain folder). > > > > The other reason I ask this is because our server resources are pretty > > heavily taxed already (new server in 2004 budget), his is a high volume > > domain, and it would be nice to disable all tests from actually running on > > that domain like in Declude Virus > > > > foolish.tld OFF > > > > Yes I am running the pro version of Declude, yes I know about IM Gate, and > > no there aren't enough hours in a day to finish all of the projects that I > > already have started. > > > > Fritz > > > > Frederick P. Squib, Jr. > > Network Operations/Mail Administrator > > Citizens Telephone Company of Kecksburg > > http://www.wpa.net > > > > --- > > [This E-mail scanned by Citizens Internet Services with Declude Virus.] > > > > --- > > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus > > (http://www.declude.com)] > > > > --- > > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > > --- > [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] > > --- > This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To > unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], and > type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found > at http://www.mail-archive.com. > --- [This E-mail was scanned for viruses by Declude Virus (http://www.declude.com)] |
Title: Message
- [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? Andy Schmidt
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Configuration Ernesto Nieto
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Configuration R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Configuratio... Ernesto Nieto
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Configur... R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] Per Domain Con... Ernesto Nieto
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? R. Scott Perry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? R. Scott Perry
- Re: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? Bill Landry
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? Andy Schmidt
- RE: [Declude.JunkMail] SPF 2.0 ? Andy Schmidt