There is. J
Since the explosion of dictionary type
attach spam, it is not recommended to have the gateway accept all. You can do
this by configuring the domain on Imail, then all the users are aliases for the
users on Exchange, which via a Recipient policy will have 2 SMTP addresses, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and [EMAIL PROTECTED] One additional benefit is you can set the domain
message size.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 4:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Slightly OT: Mail size for gateways
Yup. We do this but I was just trying to
think of a way to do it on the external relayers (Imail/Declude).
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of John Tolmachoff (Lists)
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 6:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Declude.JunkMail]
Slightly OT: Mail size for gateways
Limit in Exchange.
John Tolmachoff
Engineer/Consultant/Owner
eServices For You
-----Original Message-----
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark E. Smith
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2004 3:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [Declude.JunkMail]
Slightly OT: Mail size for gateways
In one of my configurations, I'm running
Imail/Declude in a Gateway only setup for an Exchange system.
I was reviewing some of my DLAnalyzer logs
and notices a number of single messages that were 51mb, 22mb, 30mb, etc.
Since there's no way (that I've found) to
prohibit the SMTP send size, I'm wondering if there's a way to prevent these
types of messages from eating bandwidth and system resources?
Anyone have any ideas on this one?
|
