Is the data in truncate.gbudb.net duplicated in Sniffer?
MadRiverAccess.com|Skywaves.net Tech Support
US/Canada 877-873-6482 or International +1-802-229-6574
Emergency Support 24/7: supp...@skywaves.net
General and Non-Emergency support ticket:
From: "Pete McNeil" <madscient...@microneil.com>
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2013 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: [Declude.JunkMail] No one at Declude?
On 2013-04-17 13:06, Katie La Salle-Lowery wrote:
X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 20 X-MessageSniffer-Rules:
20-0-0--1-f By the way:
We have seen a LOT of this lately.
For some reason there appear to be many Declude configurations out there
that do not account for the truncate result code from SNF.
I highly recommend that if you are using Declude, and especially if you
have seen an increase in spam leakage, you should check your configuration
and make sure that you weight result code 20 higher than other nonzero
Message Sniffer result codes.
On most systems that use SNF + Declude, not counting for the truncate
result code can result in leaking more than 10% of spam/malware that would
have been caught.
-- Pete McNeil, President MicroNeil Research Corporation www.microneil.com
703.779.4909 x7010 twitter/codedweller
--- This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and type
"unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found at
This E-mail came from the Declude.JunkMail mailing list. To
unsubscribe, just send an E-mail to imail...@declude.com, and
type "unsubscribe Declude.JunkMail". The archives can be found