Rick Hillegas wrote: > I have logged enhancement request 716 to track the re-enabling of > customer-defined Virtual Table Interfaces (VTIs). A little history follows:
> I can imagine that the non-standard nature of VTI declaration was an > issue. Are there other issues? Has anyone given some thought to what a > more acceptable API would look like? See the comments for DERBY-571 http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-571 Dan.
