[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6849?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15692093#comment-15692093
]
Bryan Pendleton commented on DERBY-6849:
----------------------------------------
I think this issue actually duplicates at least part of DERBY-3609.
DERBY-5823 is also relevant, and I'll link it, too.
> Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS returns a 1 row result set even if there are
> no auto-generated fields
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-6849
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-6849
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: JDBC
> Affects Versions: 10.9.1.0
> Reporter: John Hendrikx
> Attachments: DERBY6849Repro.java, firstExperimentNotForCommit.diff
>
>
> If:
> 1) A JDBC INSERT statement is executed, with Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS
> enabled, and
> 2) A call is then made to Statement.getGeneratedKeys, and
> 3) The table which was inserted into has *NO* generated columns,
> then getGeneratedKeys() returns a ResultSet object with a single row in it.
> This behavior seems incorrect; it seems that the correct behavior
> would be to return a ResultSet object which has *NO* rows in it, so
> that ResultSet.next() returns FALSE the first time it is called.
>
> I have a very simple table:
> {noformat}
> CREATE TABLE images (
> url varchar(1000) NOT NULL,
> image blob NOT NULL,
>
> CONSTRAINT images_url PRIMARY KEY (url)
> );
> {noformat}
> No auto-generated fields. However when I do an insert, JDBC tells me there
> are auto-generated keys (rs.next() does not return false and a LONG value is
> returned):
> {noformat}
> try(PreparedStatement statement = connection.prepareStatement(sql,
> Statement.RETURN_GENERATED_KEYS)) {
> setParameters(parameterValues, statement);
> statement.execute();
> try(ResultSet rs = statement.getGeneratedKeys()) {
> if(rs.next()) {
> return rs.getObject(1);
> }
> return null;
> }
> }
> catch(SQLException e) {
> throw new DatabaseException(this, sql + ": " + parameters, e);
> }
> {noformat}
> This sounds like a bug to me. For comparison, PostgreSQL does not have the
> same behaviour.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)
