[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-570?page=all ]
     
Jean T. Anderson closed DERBY-570:
----------------------------------


No problems have been reported with the patch that was committed, so closing.

> wrong java.sql.Type id implied for LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA
> ------------------------------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DERBY-570
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-570
>      Project: Derby
>         Type: Bug
>   Components: Documentation
>     Versions: 10.1.1.0
>     Reporter: Rick Hillegas
>      Fix For: 10.2.0.0
>  Attachments: derby570-2.diff, derby570-3.diff, derby570.diff, 
> rrefsqlj30118.html
>
> The Datatypes section of the Reference Manual says that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT 
> DATA is identical to VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA but does not give a jdbc type, 
> implying that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT DATA has the same jdbc type as VARCHAR FOR 
> BIT DATA, i.e., VARBINARY. This section should say that LONG VARCHAR FOR BIT 
> DATA has the following jdbc type: LONGVARBINARY.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

Reply via email to