Thanks, Jean. The Edition line turns up in the visible text which
appears in the printed document. That makes me think that it applies to
something that the customer, the reader, cares about. I don't think the
reader is particularly concerned about our transition to dita. If that
is what Edition is supposed to capture, perhaps the Edition lines should
be moved to a comments section so that they will not be
visible/confusing to customers.
Regards,
-Rick
Jean T. Anderson wrote:
Rick Hillegas (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1271?page=all ]
Rick Hillegas updated DERBY-1271:
---------------------------------
Attachment: derby-1271_copyrights.diff
Attaching derby-1271_copyrights.diff. This adjusts dates in the visible
copyright notices in the user guides. Touches the following files:
The update of the copyright line looks fine to me, but I'm not so sure
about the change of the "Second Edition (July 2005)" line to "Third
Edition (July 2006)".
I don't know the "Edition" history -- suspect it maps to the conversion
of the source docs to DITA. Does anyone know for sure?
-jean
