Hi Kathey,
Sounds reasonable to me except for 1450, which Knut Anders has already
analyzed.
Cheers,
-Rick
Knut Anders Hatlen wrote:
Kathey Marsden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
I looked briefly at the compatiblity issues that Deepa filed last week
and think the following should be moved to critical as they may be
regressions.
The priority could be reduced and release notes added if these prove
to be intended changes.
Any objections or thoughts on these issues?
I think 1450 is a test issue in 10.1, not a compatibility issue. See
the comment I attached to the issue.
