Re: Beta Announcement and encouraging user testing

[Francois Orsini]

Not a partial feature, but I'm working on DERBY-1517 and I will need to do a lot of testing - It is a fix that needs to get in so that DRDA Strong Password Substitute Authentication (USRSSBPWD) security mechanism can be re-enabled as a second best default when EUSRIDPWD cannot be used (i.e. JVM not supporting 256-bit DH keys when a 10.2 client interacts with a pre-10.2 server (USRSSBPWD not supported).

--francois

On 8/9/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Is anyone planning on submitting a partial feature in the next two
weeks? If so, this will affect my decision about whether to create a branch.

Regards,
-Rick

Daniel John Debrunner wrote:

>Andrew McIntyre wrote:
>
>
>
>>On 8/9/06, Rick Hillegas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>Hi David,
>>>
>>>I think there's a significant delta between the last snapshot and the
>>>beta I plan to cut imminently. I would recommend that people wait for
>>>the beta.
>>>
>>>
>>Are you planning do the beta out of the trunk? I don't think there's a
>>need to branch until there's actually potential for release. It'll
>>save a lot of merging.
>>
>>
>
>As long as it's understood the trunk remains open for all new stuff
>including new (partial) features. We could delay a branch, one can
>always go "back-in-time" to create a branch from an existing svn
>revision point, right?
>
>Dan.
>
>
>