[ 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1838?page=comments#action_12435968 ] 
            
Suresh Thalamati commented on DERBY-1838:
-----------------------------------------

you are right John.  Dual boot  through multiple JVMs is prevented on Unix  
from  JDK1.4 (1.4.0)  using the file lock  support., provided  in jdk1.4. 

/suresh

 

> Derby allows dual boot which  can cause corruption of databases with JVM's 
> lower than 1.4.2 on non-windows systems
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-1838
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-1838
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Store
>    Affects Versions: 10.0.2.0, 10.0.2.1, 10.0.2.2, 10.1.1.0, 10.2.1.0, 
> 10.1.2.1, 10.1.3.0, 10.3.0.0, 10.1.4.0, 10.1.3.1, 10.1.3.2, 10.2.2.0
>            Reporter: Kathey Marsden
>            Priority: Critical
>
> On non-windows systems accidental access of  a database from two JVM's is not 
> prevented on  JVM's lower than 1.4.2.   The issue can be triggered  by a 
> common user error, for example accessing a database from two ij sessions.  
> This can cause unrecoverable corruption.  It is critical that users upgrade 
> to 1.4.2 if there is a possibility that a user might access Derby in this way.
> There was no known way to fix this issue until 1.4.2, so it is not likely 
> that it can be resolved within Derby.  Upgrade of the JVM is the only known 
> solution now.
> Note: Even with 1.4.2 the dual boot issue exists in certain scenarios which 
> are not well documented.  DERBY-700 has been filed and hopefully other fatal 
> usage cases that can lead to dual boot can be isolated and resolved.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: 
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira

        

Reply via email to