[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13178857#comment-13178857
]
Kathey Marsden commented on DERBY-5552:
---------------------------------------
I'll work on a test case for this issue and run the patch through regression
tests. I wouldn't think a lock timeout wouldn't be a transaction level error
but a deadlock would be.
if (se.getSeverity() == ExceptionSeverity.TRANSACTION_SEVERITY) {
synchronized (this) {
// disable use of the connection until
it is cleaned up.
conn.setApplicationConnection(null);
It makes sense that the connection is needed to retrieve the error message
text, but clearly someone at some point thought it was important not to let
anything happen on this connection until the transaction was cleaned up. It
would be good to understand the scenarios for which this this code was
introduced.
> Derby threads hanging when using ClientXADataSource and a deadlock or lock
> timeout occurs
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: DERBY-5552
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-5552
> Project: Derby
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Network Server
> Affects Versions: 10.8.1.2
> Environment: Solaris 10, Glassfish V2.1.1,
> Reporter: Brett Bergquist
> Priority: Blocker
> Attachments: DERBY-5552-p1.patch, DERBY-5552-p2.patch,
> appserverstack.txt, client.tar.Z, derby.log, derbystackatshutdown.txt,
> execute.patch, transactionsleft.txt
>
>
> The issue arrives when multiple XA transactions are done in parallel and
> there is either a lock timeout or a lock deadlock detected. When this
> happens the connection is leaked in the Glassfish connection pool and the
> client thread hangs in
> "org.apache.derby.client.netReply.fill(Reply.java:172)".
> Shutting down the app server fails because the thread has a lock in
> "org.apache.derby.client.net.NetConnection40" and another task is calling
> "org.apache.derby.client.ClientPooledConnection.close(ClientPooledConnection.java:214)"
> which is waiting for the lock.
> Killing the appsever using "kill" and then attempting to shutdown Derby
> network server causes the Network Server to hang. One of the threads hangs
> waiting for a lock at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NeworkServerControlImpl.removeFromSessionTable(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:1525)"
> and the "main" thread has this locked at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.drda.NetworkServerControlImpl.executeWork(NetworkServerControlImpl.java:2242)"
> and it itself is waiting for a lock which belongs to a thread that is stuck
> at
> "org.apache.derby.impl.services.locks.ActiveLock.waitForGrant(ActiveLock.java:118)
> which is in the TIMED_WAITING state.
> Only by killing the Network Server using "kill" is possible at this point.
> There are transactions left even though all clients have been removed.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
