Agreed. Maybe I should save my efforts for the new, community-based logo
;-).

2011/3/16 Paulo José Amaro <paul...@gmail.com>

> Same here, B.
>
> Although, it's just because the kerning seems to be out of place without
> the
> other proposed changes, sadly.
> I think I'll not do help with that (and probably be counter-productive),
> but
> my personal taste is still for C [1].
>
> ~Paulo
>
> [1] -
>
> http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/cgi_img_auth.php/f/f1/LogoImprovementStep2.png
> --
> Paulo José O. Amaro
> Estudante de Ciência da Computação / UFSJ
> Webdesigner / Linked E.J.
> Blogueiro / CasaTwain.com
>
>
>
> 2011/3/15 Johannes Bausch <johannes.bau...@gmail.com>
>
> > Yes, to be honest, I don't like that half-broken ligature either. Maybe I
> > really should only do something about the kerning.
> >
> > 2011/3/15 Daniel Merker <daniel.mer...@wayne.edu>
> >
> > >
> > > My vote: B
> > >
> > > Why: It seems that the other option is employing a style that isn't
> > > consistent across the entire logo; moreover, it doesn't seem to match
> > > anything else.
> > >
> > >
> > > -Daniel Merker
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, Mar 14, 2011 at 6:48 PM, Bernhard Dippold <
> > > bernh...@familie-dippold.at> wrote:
> > >
> > > > Hi Joey, all
> > > >
> > > > I think we manage to finalize this task soon - great work, Joey!
> > > >
> > > > Johannes Bausch schrieb:
> > > >
> > > >  Hey,
> > > >>
> > > >> following your discussion I added another draft - which is rather a
> > > >> step backward, but I see that the connected ligature is your main
> > > >> concern.
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > If I understand the comments right, some people feel more comfortable
> > > > with the distinct characters.
> > > >
> > > > In fluent text they probably would not have even mentioned the
> > > > difference (except the more balanced general visual impression), but
> > > > in comparison with the present logo they felt different.
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for taking these thoughts into account and to present a
> > > > compromise containing all the other tiny modifications you included
> in
> > > > order to create an improved visual impression.
> > > >
> > > >  [...]
> > > >>
> > > >
> > > > I compared your last proposal with the current logo here:
> > > > http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/File:Logo_ligature.png
> > > > (force reload)
> > > >
> > > > If anybody wants to be pointed to the differences, please have a look
> > > > at Joey's userpage in the wiki (I won't provide the link here, but
> > > > you'll find it).
> > > >
> > > > For me it is much more important to compare the general impression
> > > > rather than the tiny modifications.
> > > >
> > > > So I ask you to vote on this comparison:
> > > >
> > > > Which logo is more balanced and expresses better the feelings we want
> > > > to be associated with LibreOffice?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > And if you prefer the present logo: Should we include the other
> > > > modifications except the "ffi" in the old logo?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Best regards
> > > >
> > > > Bernhard
> > > >
> > > > PS: I don't vote now, because some people might look at the image
> > > > already with my voting in mind which might influence their
> decision...
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List
> > > > archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> > > > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org List
> > > archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> > > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
> > > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> > > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> > >
> > >
> >
> > --
> > Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
> > List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> > *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
> >
> >
>
> --
> Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
> List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
> *** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***
>
>

-- 
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to design+h...@libreoffice.org
List archive: http://listarchives.libreoffice.org/www/design/
*** All posts to this list are publicly archived for eternity ***

Reply via email to