What if all notebookbar options were separated into individual widgets that could be rearranged into whatever order that the user wanted? The standard toolbar does kind of have that all ready. The notebookbar could then be applied as the main tool section, additional toolbars, and the sidebar, configured by presets and user preference.
Any sufficiently advanced technology is magic to those who do not understand it.-A variation on Clarke's Third Law -------- Original message --------From: "kainz.a" <kain...@gmail.com> Date: 3/25/18 3:08 PM (GMT-06:00) To: Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com> Cc: LibO Design <design@global.libreoffice.org>, Kshitij Pathania <kshitijpatha...@gmail.com> Subject: Re: [libreoffice-design] Merged Toolbar/Notebookbar menu What's the difference between toolbars, sidebar and notebookbars. They are different from a dev point of view but from a user perspective they shouldn't be separate. So from my point of view no prefix but as you ordinary don't want to switch the UI often (you have one work-flow) I'm for a section in the configuration dialog where there is also some explanation. In addition the section is the menubar is needed (also for some notebookbar implementation this drop down list was used). Add the different layouts into the configuration dialog give also the information what's a notebookbar and a standard toolbar (the icon size can be different configured). Cheers Andreas_K 2018-03-25 21:02 GMT+02:00 Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com>: > Hello, > > in the patch https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/49575/ Kshitij is working > on issue tdf#115131 (merging the two menu flavors). The patch works find > but we stumbled over the label question. Right now it looks like this > > Toolbar > Standard > Single > Sidebar > - separator - > Notebookbar > Contextual groups > Notebookbar > Contextual single > Notebookbar > Tabbed > > My comment was to remove the prefix but Jay disagreed with the remark that > such a combined menu would better be called UI Layout. The change may look > like this > > UI Layout > Standard > Single > Sidebar > - separator - > Contextual groups > Contextual single > Tabbed > > Now I wonder how users may read "UI Layout > Single", for instance. And > calling it "Single Toolbar" is also not that nice thinking about "Standard" > or "Standard Toolbar" (and suffixes are similarly awkward as prefixes). > > I still prefer this plain solution as any prefix is a clear indicator for > bad usability (meaning the items are actually meant for a submenu). Any > opinion? > > Cheers, > Heiko > > > -- > To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org > Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to- > unsubscribe/ > Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette > List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ > All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be > deleted > -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted -- To unsubscribe e-mail to: design+unsubscr...@global.libreoffice.org Problems? https://www.libreoffice.org/get-help/mailing-lists/how-to-unsubscribe/ Posting guidelines + more: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Netiquette List archive: https://listarchives.libreoffice.org/global/design/ All messages sent to this list will be publicly archived and cannot be deleted
