On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 14:06 -0500, Luis Villa wrote:
> > His tantrum was on our extremely irresponsible transition from 1.x to
> > 2.0, where no one bothered to see if there were regressions, we didn't
> > provide a migration path for user's settings, we didn't write migration
> > documents for all the APIs that got replaced, and we just shoved
> > everything under the rug.
>
> No, that's not what his tantrum was about:
> http://www.jwz.org/doc/cadt.html
Since you want to nitpick:
"This is, I think, the most common way for my bug reports to
open source software projects to ever become closed. I report
bugs; they go unread for a year, sometimes two; and then
(surprise!) that module is rewritten from scratch -- and the new
maintainer can't be bothered to check whether his new version
has actually solved any of the known problems that existed in
the previous version."
Seems to match my "no one bothered to see if there were regressions",
and "we just shoved everything under the rug". I just spiced it up a
little. Tra la la.
Federico
_______________________________________________
desktop-devel-list mailing list
desktop-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list
