Hi, On Thu, Apr 2, 2009 at 9:51 AM, Cosimo Cecchi <cosi...@gnome.org> wrote: > I add another question here, as a complete dconf/GConf newbie: > is depending on Bonobo/Corba vs DBus the only thing that makes GConf not > useful towards GNOME 3.0 or are there some other > design/preformance/whatever issues requiring a full rewrite to be > solved?
http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/plans.html http://projects.gnome.org/gconf/plans-spec.html (would recommend checklisting dconf against this list, I think Ryan and I did a couple years ago, but there's been a lot of change since) > We learned, with the GIO transition, that porting lots of applications > isn't fun, and is something which takes much time to be completed > project-wide. As GConf is probably even more widely used than gnome-vfs > was, porting could be an even bigger effort. The only sane thing imo would be to have a gconf compatibility wrapper around dconf. Havoc _______________________________________________ desktop-devel-list mailing list desktop-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/desktop-devel-list